Movies

BGCP Podcasts and Comic Con

 

BGCP Comic Con was started as The Big Glasgow Comic Page back in July 2012 mostly out of boredom and trying to find more Comic Fans to speak to, The Scottish Facebook Page gathered likes extremely fast as there wasn’t anything like it at the time and eventually this led to a Comic Book Group, Pub Quizzes, Tournaments and eventually a Comic Book Market  based soley in Glasgow.  We organized BGCP Comic Markets for several years until we had outgrown the smaller venues in Glasgow City Centre so set out to run Comic Cons in and out of Glasgow and further over Scotland including East Kilbride, Rutherglen, Loch Lomond, Dunoon, Aberdeen, Bathgate, Edinburgh, Glenrothes, Kirkcaldy and countless more towns and cities. 

BGCP Comic Con is a series of Scottish Conventions that happen in and around Glasgow, Fife and Aberdeen. BGCP also publish articles, reviews and news.

Previous Convention Guests have included Frank Quitely, Al Ewing, Alan Grant, Gary Erskine, Monty Nero, Yishan Li, David Baillie, Grant Perkins, David Bishop, John Lees, Jim Stewart, Tom Foster and Neil Slorance

We cover Comic Books News, Articles and Reviews from Marvel Comics, DC Comics, Image Comics, IDW Publishing, BOOM Studios, Dark Horse Comics and many more. We also provide the same for movies, television and video games.

Here are some of the main companies and characters that BGCP covers – Marvel Comics, DC Comics, Image Comics, IDW Publishing, Dark Horse Comics, Dynamite, BOOM Studios, 2000AD, Titan Comics, Legendary Comics, Millarworld, Aftershock Comics,Valiant Comics.

BGCP Podcasts

BGCP launched the BGCP:Disassembled Podcast in February 2021 and release weekly episodes featuring the latest comic book news and reviews, we also run weekly interviews and have also featured many writers and writers from Marvel, DC, Image and more.

Review – Thor: Ragnarok

Review – Thor: Ragnarok Directed by: Taika Waititi Written by: Craig Kyle & Christopher Yost Produced by: Stan Lee & Kevin Feige Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston & Mark Ruffalo Release Date: October 24th 2017 (UK) Last night, I re-watched Thor: Ragnarok for review to see how well it holds up a few years on from its release. While there is still a very fun movie to be enjoyed here, it is far from perfect. I wonder if the filmmakers were so paranoid about not churning out another formulaic, checklist of a Marvel movie after the snooze-fest that was the Dark World, that they just chucked a whole bunch of disparate ideas into this mixing pot of a film and hoped that some of it would work. To some extent they were right; some of it does work, but some of it really doesn’t. The stuff that doesn’t work would probably work okay in a separate movie, but here it just provides a lack of cohesion and brings a jolting change of tone to many of the film’s scenes. The abrupt tonal shift that takes place whenever we change environments is one of my biggest issues when going back to re-watch the film. Some plot elements also feel rushed in the film, which means that less emotional impact is felt overall by the audience at the climax of each plot thread. The plot elements of Ragnarok could have been split across a few movies and it would mean that certain characters wouldn’t have been wasted and that the big events that take place would have had more weight and gravitas to them, instead of just being brushed off in favour of getting to the next punch-line. For example, Odin dies in this film and Thor and Loki deal with it and move on in a matter of seconds. There are no emotional repercussions felt whatsoever. Another example of this is the Warriors Three appearing in a single scene, having no dialogue and then being killed in a matter of seconds of being onscreen. Additionally, a character arc is attempted with Skurge, but again Karl Urban is onscreen for such a small amount of time that no resolution is felt following his sacrifice at the end of the movie. As soon as Cate Blanchett starts to show some potential as a memorable Marvel villain, the movie cuts away to yet another scene of Hulk and Thor bantering on Sakaar. The fact that Hela spends the whole movie in Asgard and Thor and Loki spend most of the movie on Sakaar, means that the main threat in the film always feels very distant and disconnected. Idris Elba is wasted here too, having barely any dialogue and a very dull subplot. Jeff Goldblum is used purely as a gimmick and again is wasted by not having anywhere near enough screen time. I normally like seeing Tessa Thompson in things, but even she phones it in here. Then, at the end of the movie, it is like the filmmakers suddenly remembered, ‘oh that’s right we need to conclude that Ragnarok subplot that we started at the beginning of the movie.’ You know the goddamn title of the movie? And so Surtur destroying Asgard gets tacked on at the end to sort of bring a conclusion to all of the other multiple subplots and lazily wrap up the movie. The sheer amount of ideas that they attempted to incorporate here, causes a number of elements of the movie’s plot to feel underdeveloped and although most of these separate parts could have worked if they were split up and fleshed out, here they all just end up falling flat by the end of the movie making the film feel anti-climatic as a whole. Don’t get me wrong, there is also a lot here that works too. I thought the cameos from Matt Damon, Luke Hemsworth and Sam Neill was awesome. I liked the Doctor Strange appearance. I like how they had Thor lose his eye and I especially like how they managed to keep that out of all of the trailers and marketing. The trailers did ruin some things though, if we didn’t already know that Mjolnir was going to get destroyed through seeing the trailers, it would have had more of an impact and all the talk about the vicious rival that Thor would have to face in the gladiator ring would have been way more effective if we didn’t already know that it was going to be the Hulk. Let’s end things on a high note, the visuals were spectacular and this movie is worth going to see in theatres just for this alone. The CGI was incredible and the soundtrack was pretty great too. Overall this is still a very fun movie, even if it is a little bit all over the place. [yasr_multiset setid=2] [yasr_visitor_multiset setid=2] If you enjoyed Dan’s review of Thor: Ragnarok, you can check out what he thought of Thor: The Dark World here.

Review – Thor: Ragnarok Read More »

Review – Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi

Review – Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi Directed by: Rian Johnson Produced by: JJ Abrams & Kathleen Kennedy Written by: Rian Johnson Starring: John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Oscar Isaac & Adam Driver Release Date: December 14th 2017 I decided to re-watch The Last Jedi for review last night for the first time since seeing it in the cinema upon its release and with the benefit of hindsight, I can honestly say that I hated it even more than I did the first time. I get that Rian Johnson was going for something different, but damn! This movie was not what anyone expected and not in a good way. I now feel comfortable definitively saying that absolutely none of the twisted decisions in this film were made for the better. Despite that, there are still aspects of this movie that I do like. First off, the performances all around were brilliant, with the stand outs being Adam Driver and Mark Hamill. Adam driver plays a conflicted and tortured, yet exceedingly powerful Kylo Ren. His performance is electric throughout the movie and as an actor, his range is extremely impressive. Although this is definitely my least favourite portrayal of Luke Skywalker in a Star Wars movie, it is probably my favourite performance of Mark Hamill playing the iconic character. He commits to the absurd decisions that Johnson makes with integrity and grit and it is clear that he has greatly honed his skills as an actor in the 30+ years since the original trilogy. The special effects and CGI work in the movie is breath-taking at points, the movie is a joy to look at on a visual level and the technical achievement of some of the shots featured is nothing short of incredible. Now, onto the issues I had when re-watching The Last Jedi for review. First off, the whole Casino planet section of the movie really should have just been removed altogether. Ignore it, it has no bearing to the overall plot and if it wasn’t included, the movie would still play out in the exact same way. The entire segment is a waste of time and the end result isn’t even worth the hassle. Finn was one of my favourite characters in The Force Awakens, so it was good to see him get his own storyline here, but the awkward moments and lack of payoff make it such a waste of time for the audience. The shoehorned message about animal cruelty also felt too forced and cringe-inducing and that is coming from an animal lover. The whole sequence also brought back horrible memories of the prequels, which is something that I never want to be reminded of again. The other dumb subplot in this movie revolves around Poe and a new character played by Laura Dern called Admiral Holdo. After Leia is incapacitated, Holdo is put in charge of the Rebels. Poe asks her repeatably what the plan is to get out of the compromising situation they are stuck in and she refuses to tell him, labelling him as a hothead flyboy. He eventually decides he can’t just sit around and do nothing while their ship is destroyed, (which is also the catalyst for Finn and Rose going on their dumb side mission to the casino planet,) and so he enacts a mutiny on Holdo. Then Leia wakes up and reveals that the plan all along was to take the escape pods to a nearby planet containing an old rebel base and attempt a last stand there. This whole mutiny could have been avoided with a simple conversation, or even a goddamn post-it note. Another thing that bothered me was the lack of any significant scene showing Rey being trained by Luke. There are two fleeting scenes of her training and that is apparently enough to allow her to become a ‘jedi.’ Instead of following Finn and Rose on their pointless adventure, or Poe and his pointless mutiny, we should have spent the majority of the movie on Luke’s island. To this day, I still don’t know why they chose to portray Luke as such a slob. This is the guy that blew up the Death Star and spearheaded the rebellion that changed the tide of war across the entire galaxy and now he’s milking weird sloth creatures for food. Even now, I still don’t hate the reveal that Rey’s parents were nobodies that came from nothing, but it just makes all of the set up in Force Awakens and in the first half of this movie seem like such a waste of everyone’s time, especially when you know that they are going to go back on it in the next movie. I also hate the fact that they squander an interesting character when they just nonchalantly kill off Snoke. Watching the film for the first time, you are left wondering, with the age he looks and his torn up face, this guy has clearly been around for a long time, like probably as long as Yoda or Vader, so how come we have we never seen him over the course of the previous eight films? Was he in hiding? If so, then why was he in hiding? Why did he come out of hiding after the Empire fell and why was he appointed as Supreme Leader? However, it turns out that none of these questions matter when you find out that he is just a clone and Snokes are ten-a-penny puppets for Sidious. What an absolute waste of potential. Knowing that reveal is coming also makes the throne room scene in The Last Jedi such a hollow victory in hindsight. Lastly, I want to talk about Phasma. Rian Johnson has joked that she was like this trilogy’s version of Kenny from South Park and frankly I think that this is a valid comparison and I don’t think that it’s something to joke about. Gwendoline Christie is a phenomenal actress and she was so wasted in these movies. Her bulletproof armour

Review – Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi Read More »

Review – The Raid: Redemption

Review – The Raid: Redemption Directed by: Gareth Evans Produced by: Todd Brown Written by: Gareth Evans Starring: Iko Uwais, Ray Sahetapy & Doni Alamsyah Release Date: May 18th 2012 (UK) What do you get when you take a Welsh director, a bunch of Indonesian stuntmen and a block of high rise flats and put them together? One of the greatest action movies ever committed to film apparently. I love a great action movie and I love tight, clever fight choreography and the Raid delivers this in spades. There is an extravagant display of martial arts on display here all shown with a realistic sense of brutality and grit that is a joy to watch onscreen. Whether it is a bare-knuckle hand-to-hand fight that you are witnessing, or a fight using deadly melee weapons, every sequence is beautifully brutal and expertly crafted in terms of its choreography. Although the fight sequences and intense action are the star attraction in The Raid, Gareth Evans uses his actors and his camera work to make the audience feel an unfaltering sense of tension when necessary to balance the sheer, white-knuckle excitement of other scenes. I have watched this movie a ton and I have seen the subtitled version, the dubbed version and the original Indonesian version without subtitles. Even in the latter, when none of the characters are speaking any English, you can still easily follow what is going on, due to the expressive performances given by the cast. Overall, if you are an action fan, you can’t do much better than the Raid. It is an intense story told so well by a bunch of extremely talented people. I would go as far as to argue that the level of intensity present in this movie’s fight choreography and its sequel has not been equalled since in any other action movie. Which makes the Raid movies some of my favourite action films of all time. [yasr_multiset setid=2] [yasr_visitor_multiset setid=2] Fun fact: some of the cast members from The Raid also appeared in Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Read our review for that here! Buy tickets for BGCP Comic Con in and around Glasgow Scotland – BUY TICKETS Check out all of our Comic, Movie, Television and Videogame Reviews HERE and our Podcasts/Interviews HERE If you want to be part of the BGCP community, Join us on Discord, Twitter, Instagram etc then click HERE

Review – The Raid: Redemption Read More »

Review: Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015)

The Return of the Jedi It has been over 30 years since Return of the Jedi. Fans have waited decades for a true sequel. Finally, Star Wars: Episode VII – The Force Awakens is here. J.J. Abrams takes the director’s chair. He faces a massive challenge. Can he revive the magic of the original trilogy? The expectations are sky-high. Disney bought Lucasfilm and promised a new era. This film is the first step. Does it succeed? Yes, it largely does. A New Generation of Heroes The story introduces us to Rey (Daisy Ridley). She is a scavenger on the desert planet Jakku. We also meet Finn (John Boyega). He is a stormtrooper with a conscience. He flees the First Order in a TIE Fighter. Fate brings them together. They also team up with a familiar face: Han Solo (Harrison Ford). Ford slips back into the role effortlessly. He brings charm and gravitas to the screen. The chemistry between the new cast is excellent. Ridley and Boyega are instant stars. They carry the film with energy and heart. Oscar Isaac also shines as the daring pilot Poe Dameron. Read our review of the sequel The Dark Side Rises Every hero needs a villain. Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) fills that void. He is not just another Darth Vader clone. He is unstable, angry, and dangerous. Driver delivers a fantastic performance. He shows us a villain who is still conflicted. The First Order replaces the Empire. They are fanatical and terrifying. General Hux and Captain Phasma add to the threat level. The stakes feel real. Nostalgia vs. Originality Abrams leans heavily on nostalgia. The plot mirrors A New Hope in many ways. There is a droid carrying secret plans. There is a desert planet. There is a massive superweapon. Some fans might find it too similar. It feels like a “greatest hits” album at times. However, this familiarity helps ground the story. It reminds us why we love this universe. The practical effects also look amazing. Real sets and puppets replace the CGI overload of the prequels. Watch on Disney+ The Verdict The Force Awakens is a triumph. It washes away the bad taste of the prequels. It is fun, emotional, and visually stunning. J.J. Abrams has successfully rebooted the franchise. He sets up exciting mysteries for the future. We can’t wait to see what happens in Episode VIII. The Force is strong with this one. Score: 4.5/5

Review: Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015) Read More »

Review – Ready Player One (2018)

Review – Ready Player One (2018) Directed by: Steven Spielberg Produced by: Steven Spielberg & Ernest Cline Written by: Zak Penn & Ernest Cline Starring: Tye Sheridan, Mark Rylance, Ben Mendelsohn and Simon Pegg Release Date: March 28th 2018 (UK) Writing a review for Ready Player one is a task that requires several viewings of the movie due to all of all of the references and Easter eggs etc that are present in the film to take in. So please take comfort in knowing that I had to suffer for the sake of this review. After watching the movie a couple more times and watching a bunch of Easter egg videos on Youtube, I now feel more equipped to discuss the film. First off, I have never read the book that this film is based on. It has been recommended to me quite a few times, but I have never gotten around to reading it, so I went into this movie with no pre-conceived ideas of what it was going to be other than what I had seen in the various trailers. Let’s start with the good stuff. Although I have some issues with the overabundance of CGI onscreen, as a 3D animator myself I was extremely impressed at the sheer quality of the animation in the movie. I know that this thing had a pretty high budget behind it, but still the level of quality in the animation is really high throughout the film. The references are also pretty cool, at least for the first third of the movie but the novelty of seeing some of your favourite pop culture characters does wear off after a while and ends up feeling like a cheap gimmick before too long. Finally, if all you are looking for is a big dumb fun blockbuster, then this movie provides that in spades. Ok, onto the stuff that bothered me. As I said above, although the quality of the CGI is pretty incredible, the vast amount of it gets tiresome after a while. I also didn’t like the character designs at all; Parzival looks like a rejected piece of Final Fantasy artwork and Art3mis looks like a stereotypical version of a what a middle aged man thinks a cool hacker looks like with a weird resemblance to a feline. Aech just looked chunky and awkward, like something from a last-gen Gears Of War game, I-R0k’s weird, edgy, fantasy-based design didn’t fit his voice or the tone of the scenes he appeared in and Sorrento’s avatar just looked distractingly like a dastardly Clark Kent for some reason. Also, these original character designs seemed oddly out of place being surrounded by other characters from franchises that we already know like DC and Mortal Kombat, none of it meshed well at all. It also really annoyed me how they kept touching on the idea that someone in the Oasis might not necessarily look the same as they do in real life and if you ever met them in real life you would be sorely disappointed, only for the reason for all of this to be a small birthmark on Olivia Cooke’s character’s face. The way that they make her out to some sort of beast-like monster because of a minor skin-irregularity is ridiculous and also slightly offensive. Also, we are told during the movie’s opening sequence that the Oasis is a worldwide thing, where people from anywhere on the planet can meet up online and fight together or kill each other for coins. Then halfway through the movie, all of the characters meet up in a small ice cream truck in the real world and it turns out that they all live within a few miles of each other. It just made the whole thing feel really small scale. Another issue is that the movie is only 3 years old at this point and it already feels terribly dated. I don’t see this movie ageing very well in the long term at all and this is both due to the CGI and the references that they choose to include. Lastly, as I said earlier, if what you want out of this movie is mindless fun, then you’ll walk away satisfied, but the problem with that is that the movie seems to want to be more than that. The way that the movie treats itself and the way it was marketed along with the fact that it’s got Spielberg in the director’s chair, signifies that the filmmakers were intending for this to be this generation’s Back To The Future or Star Wars and on that front it totally fails. In these other movies that this film is aspiring to be, you care about what happens to the characters and want to see where they go, whereas here the audience cares way more about seeing the next popular franchise references than anything that happens to the main characters at the heart of this story and once you’ve seen the film, you are going to leave talking about the characters that appeared from outside franchises rather than the ones created for this story. The characters are also instantly forgettable, for example I have seen this film more than five times now and still couldn’t tell you the real world names of any of the characters other than Wade Watts and Sorrento and that’s only because he has the same name in the real world as he does in the Oasis. I also don’t care if I never see any of these characters again if I’m being honest. Apparently there is a sequel movie to this already in the early stages of development, as the first movie made a bunch of money at the box office and there is apparently a sequel book in the works, but frankly I wouldn’t care if I never saw any of these characters again and I don’t care where the story is going either. In conclusion, upon revisiting Ready Player One for review, it

Review – Ready Player One (2018) Read More »

The Dark Knight Review: Why It Is A 2008 Masterpiece

The Dark Knight Review: Why It Is A 2008 Masterpiece

Searching for a definitive The Dark Knight review to see if Christopher Nolan’s epic still holds the crown? Since its release in 2008, this film hasn’t just remained a fan favorite—it has become the gold standard for the entire genre. While modern hits like The Batman have tried to capture its grit, our The Dark Knight review explores why this crime epic remains untouchable in 2026. The Plot: An Intense Dark Knight Review of Gotham The story follows Batman (Christian Bale), Lieutenant Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman), and District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) as they form an alliance to dismantle organized crime in Gotham. However, their efforts are sabotaged by a chaotic new criminal mastermind known as The Joker (Heath Ledger). As we dive deeper into this The Dark Knight review, it’s clear the film is a high-stakes crime thriller. The opening bank heist sets a tone of realism that was unheard of for comic book movies at the time. The Joker doesn’t want money; he wants to prove that under pressure, everyone is as “ugly” as he is. Heath Ledger: The Performance That Changed Everything In any The Dark Knight review, Heath Ledger is the undisputed center of gravity. His Oscar-winning portrayal of the Joker wasn’t just “good acting”—it was a seismic shift in pop culture. Ledger famously isolated himself for weeks to develop the character’s unique, high-pitched “glass-shredding” voice and manic tics. From the “pencil trick” to his chillingly calm interrogation by Batman, Ledger transformed the Joker from a “clown” into a philosophical force of nature. Even in 2026, his performance remains the benchmark that no other villain has quite reached. Christian Bale: From Cult Star to Global Icon While Ledger stole the headlines, we have to look at how Christian Bale used this film to become a global superstar. Before 2008, Bale was respected for cult hits like American Psycho, but The Dark Knight proved he could carry the biggest movie in the world. Bale’s Bruce Wayne provided the emotional weight that allowed Ledger’s Joker to shine. His physical dedication—rebuilding his body after The Machinist—became the blueprint for the modern “superhero transformation.” After this film smashed the $1 billion mark, Bale wasn’t just an actor; he was a box-office titan. The Long Halloween Review Gear Up: Must-Have Gear After Our Dark Knight Review If our The Dark Knight review has you ready to return to Gotham, check out these top-rated items on Amazon: Final Verdict: Wrapping Up Our Dark Knight Review To wrap up this The Dark Knight review, Christopher Nolan didn’t just make a Batman movie; he made a cinematic masterpiece that transcends the genre. It is a haunting exploration of order vs. chaos that remains as relevant today as it was in 2008. Final Score: 10/10

The Dark Knight Review: Why It Is A 2008 Masterpiece Read More »

Review – Justice League (2017)

Review – Justice League (2017) Directed by: Zack Snyder (but really Joss Whedon) Produced by: Charles Roven & Deborah Snyder Written by: Zack Snyder, Joss Whedon and Chris Terrio Starring: Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Gal Gadot, Ray Fisher, and Ezra Miller Release Date: November 17th 2017 (UK) Last Friday, a movie dropped that most comic book fans have been hotly anticipating for the last few decades; Zack Snyder’s Justice League. Regardless of what you may think of the Snydercut, it is hard to deny that the fact that it was actually made and put out is a significant turn of events within the movie industry. A lot has already been said about the precedent that it sets for the sway that fan campaigns could have over movies going forward, but that is a whole other conversation for another time. Instead, in this review for Justice League, I want to look at the theatrical cut of the film. Finished off by Joss Whedon after Zack Snyder had to abandon the project due to a personal family tragedy and put out into the world in 2017, the original cut of this film took somewhat of a beating upon release. I remember seeing it at the time and being unimpressed, but also not finding it offensively bad either. I re-watched it recently for this review to help discern the major differences between this cut and the Snydercut and it there is no denying that it is certainly a very different movie. This movie had a lot going against it going in; to start with, there was the previously mentioned replacement of its director mid-production. There was a large amount of pressure put on the film by fans to be as good as Whedon’s other major superhero team up movie; The Avengers. It also acted as the follow up to the critical disappointment that was Dawn of Justice, with the studio scrambling to claw back some of the goodwill from fans and critics through weird marketing choices, in the hope that at the very least, Justice League could at least be a commercial success. Lastly, there is also the fact that comic book fans had been waiting for decades to see the Justice League appear on the big screen, so that alone brings a fair amount of pressure with it. All of this combined meant that Justice League had a lot to live up to. With all of this said, even after seeing the far superior Snydercut of the movie, Justice League is still just an okay movie. It is by no means a great piece of cinema, but its fine. It is certainly not the worst film in the DCEU; I’m not sure whether that says more about Justice League 2017 or the DCEU as a whole, but I’ll leave that for you to ponder. The first half of the 2017 cut is extremely choppy and unfocused and feels more like a grab bag of scenes cut together to resemble a story rather than any sort of coherent story. Then the last half of the movie plays it incredibly safe and plays out exactly how you would predict. There are no surprises or twists and then the credits roll and half heartedly set up a potential sequel, which is fairly laughable knowing what we know now about the utter failure that was Warner Brothers attempting to force the DCEU into becoming a significant part of superhero pop-culture. In terms of reviewing Justice League 2017, there isn’t really much to talk about; which is disappointing. Although Batman V Superman left a great deal to be desired as far as being a decent comic book movie, it at least gave all of us plenty to talk about. The cast are alright, I enjoyed seeing Affleck as Batman as I always do and I love his chemistry with Alfred in both cuts of this movie. Cavill puts in a decent Superman performance if you can get by that extremely dodgy CGI upper lip. Gal Gadot is great as Wonder Woman, Ray Fisher does fine in his greatly reduced role as Cyborg and Jason Momoa’s Aquaman is pretty one-dimensional, because the DCEU’s Aquaman is written to be remarkably one-dimensional in every film he appears in. Ezra Miller is annoying but clearly supposed to be the comic relief in the film. JK Simmons is wasted as Jim Gordon, but it’s nice to see Amy Adams in a reduced role here. I don’t hate Amy Adams, but I have never been a fan of her portrayal as Lois Lane and surprisingly, she actually serves a purpose in this film, as opposed to pondering about with a camera looking surprised. The SFX varies greatly, with some really impressive visual effects and some that look like absolute garbage and could have been handled better. Something else that could have been handled far better was the resurrection of Superman. As a long time comic book fan and knowing the significance of this plot point in the comics, it feels extremely rushed and half-hearted by comparison in this film. Overall, it’s not the worst movie in the world; it’s not even the worst movie in this universe, but really it should have been far better than it is. The Justice League movie should have been so much better than, ‘just okay,’ It’s crazy to think that this film released just a month after Thor: Ragnarok, and managed to be significantly worse than the third sequel to one of the least popular Avengers’ solo films. Justice League should have blown a Thor movie out of the water, both commercially and critically, yet here we are.

Review – Justice League (2017) Read More »

Review – Zack Snyder’s Justice League

Review – Zack Snyder’s Justice League Directed by: Zack Snyder Produced by: Charles Roven & Deborah Snyder Written by: Zack Snyder, Will Beall, and Chris Terrio Starring: Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Gal Gadot, Ray Fisher, and Ezra Miller Release Date: March 18, 2021 It’s difficult to talk about Zack Snyder’s Justice League without talking about its older bizarro clone from 2017, simply titled ‘Justice League’ sans author attribution. Likewise, it’s almost impossible to watch the film if you’ve seen the original Frankenstein’s monster of a movie without constantly thinking back to that experience and noticing what’s different without much effort. When it comes down to it, Zack Snyder’s Justice League (which I will henceforth refer to as ZSJL for the mercy of my fingers) is the same skeleton as the 2017 film. The story beats are, at their core, either identical or very similar. However, like a house that’s been remodeled, though the floor plan might be recognizable, everything from the roofing to the baseboards is new and ever so slightly different. Also, someone added a few new rooms. Some of those rooms feel like they should have been there from the start, and some of them are glorified storage cabinets that probably weren’t necessary. But when WB gives you a renovation budget of 70 millions USD, you make the biggest damn house you can. Review – Shazam! And so it goes with the release of the long fabled Snyder Cut, finally unearthed, finished, and unleashed to the masses on HBO Max at a whopping four hours in length. It feels like a strange side effect of the Covid pandemic that’s gripped the world and shut down movie theaters for the past year as of March 2021 along with the long of WB’s burgeoning streaming service, and would almost certainly not exist without that mixture of elements. Yet, here we are, four years after the critically and commercially maligned theatrical draft of the project, ready to watch a product that we were told multiple times over the years was not real, and never would be. The real question now is, does it outshine the 2017 version of the first ever big screen DC superhero team up? Find out in our review of Zack Snyder’s Justice League. STORY For those just joining us, or who skipped or don’t remember the original theatrical version of this movie, the premise goes a little like this: Superman is dead at the hands of a cave troll. Sorry, I mean, Doomsday. Batman has been warned of an enemy of some sort coming to earth by a twitchy Lex Luthor via Jesse Eisenberg, and has told Wonder Woman that they need to find and unite the other super beings in their world to combat this nebulous threat. The threat comes in the form of an invasion by the demonic Steppenwolf from the hell world of Apokolips, searching for three artifacts known as Mother Boxes that will unite and do… something. To stop him, Batman will have to gather the world’s soon-to-be greatest heroes and, inevitably, when that isn’t enough, resurrect the fallen Kryptonian. This all remains more or less true in Zack Snyder’s Justice League. The biggest change in this restored, original vision of Zack Snyder’s Superhero get-together is just a general addition of breathing room. Though we’re familiar with Bruce Wayne, Clark Kent, and Diana Prince from previous films, ZSJL bears the burden of introducing the audience to two new characters almost entirely from scratch. The 2017 cut of Justice League made some significant changes to the presentation of Barry Allen and Victor Stone, and after watching this new cut of the movie it is immediately apparent how much these cuts really hurt the perceived soul of the film. Some might call this new version ‘bloated’, but the increased scope for these two heroes is appreciable. Review – Aquaman Victor Stone, also known as Cyborg, is elevated from a moving, breathing plot point in what might be the biggest set of additions. Whole sub-plots, scenes, and backstory are reintegrated into the movie that make victor a much more well rounded character with an actual arc throughout the movie. Somewhat ironically, the portrayal of Cyborg in the Zack Snyder cut and the fleshing out of his relationship with his father and the world around him makes him far more human. Second to that are the changes made to Barry Allen. Barry only really receives one additional scene in the film, and arguably it’s a scene that could easily be removed without losing much in the plot or character. What really sticks out for Barry is the actual tone and importance of the character. In the 2017 cut, Barry is very much the inexperienced new kid, requiring a pep talk from Bruce Wayne before engaging in the very first major battle of the film. His role in the ultimate climax of the film is essentially played for laughs as he’s shuffled off to the side to rescue a stranded family and play second fiddle to a CGI Henry Cavill carrying an entire building several feet away. Barry is still the same hyperactive, somewhat awkward ball of energy as played by Ezra Miller in this version, but he is noticeably more competent. Requiring neither pep talks, nor pratfalls onto anyone’s chest for giggles, this version of The Flash clearly knows how to use his powers. Thanks to that, he’s granted a much deeper level of agency in this film. Without giving too much away for those who haven’t braved the four hour journey yet, Barry now plays a crucial role in the final third of the movie that is both awesome to watch, and perhaps lays the seeds down for the upcoming Flashpoint movie that is still planned as of 2021. eview – Man Of Steel Finally, third and perhaps most unexpected, is a complete overhaul of Steppenwolf. Steppenwolf in his 2017 incarnation was entirely forgettable except for just how jarringly generic he was as a villain.

Review – Zack Snyder’s Justice League Read More »

Review – Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

Review – Rogue One: A Star Wars Story Directed by: Gareth Edwards Produced by: Kathleen Kennedy Written by: Chris Weitz & Tony Gilroy Starring: Felicity Jones, Diego Luna & Alan Tudyk Release Date: December 15th 2016 Half a decade after its release, I decided that it was time to go back and review Rogue One, (aka the best Star Wars movie to be released following the Disney acquisition of Lucasfilm.) Upon its release, the film recieved rave reviews; with one review of Rogue One going as far as to compare it in quality to Empire Strikes Back, (widely considered to be the superior Star Wars film.) It actually also garnered a fair amount of Oscar buzz for that years awards ceremony. All of this, – along with the fact that it was following the positively received Force Awakens, – meant that audience expectations were set pretty high going in. For me, the film lived up to my personal expectations that I had for it at the time and in the years with every subsequent viewing, it has actually grown on me even more. That doesn’t mean that I’m going to write an entirely glowing review for Rogue One, as the movie still has its flaws. There are some parts of the film that I loved and some that I didn’t and to really get into the meat of that, I am going to have do delve into spoiler territory. The movie is 5 years old at the time of writing this review, so everyone should have really seen it by now. One of my favourite things about the movie is how well it ties into the start of A New Hope and how it actually fixes that movie’s biggest plot-hole by explaining that the weak point in the Death Star was installed on purpose by Galen Erso while designing the battle station under the Empire’s thumb, so that the Rebels would have a chance to destroy it. I also loved the fact that the movie had the guts to kills off the entire Rogue One crew at the end, which is something that they really had to do since none of these characters are ever mentioned at any point in the original trilogy. And that corridor scene at the end with Vader was possibly the best scene I’ve seen in the cinema in the last 5 years, but I will talk more about why I love it so much later in the review. Those are the stand out positives of the movie for me, however there were also a few flaws throughout the film. First of all, that Grand Mof Tarkin CGI recreation of Peter Cushing is awful, the whole thing looks like a character from the Clone Wars animated series. When he is first introduced it is through a glass reflection on a window he is looking out of and in that part of the scene it was fairly convincing, however he then turns around and the camera moves to a medium close up shot and all of a sudden it feels like watching a video game cutscene. Guy Henry was the actor who did the motion capture for Tarkin and he actually looks relatively similar to Peter Cushing, so why they didn’t just apply some makeup to Guy Henry and dye his hair gray to resemble Cushing more and recast the Tarkin role is beyond me. It would also have also been a lot cheaper than the CG method that they decided to go with. Either that or he should have only been seen in the reflection of the glass, since that was the only time that the CGI effect actually looked convincing. However, I do think that the CGI recreation of 1970’s Carrie Fischer at the end of the movie is slightly more convincing and if it wasn’t for her eyes and the movement in her mouth, it would be way more difficult to tell that that is a CGI character. Another flaw I have with this movie is the how rushed and choppy the first act feels. The characters are all introduced quickly and vaguely, then it takes a good while for them to actually form up as a team. I get that introducing a whole cast of brand new characters in a short space of time isn’t always easy, but they could have handled it better than how they do here. In a lot of ways Rogue One actually works as a contrast to Force Awakens. In Force Awakens, the plot is essentially the same as A New Hope and is a fairly by the book, traditional Star Wars story, but the characters were what makes that movie entertaining. If the characters in Force Awakens weren’t as well written, that movie would have been mediocre at best. In Rogue One, the characters are pretty shallow and underdeveloped. They are introduced quickly and by the end of the movie none of them have really had a proper character arc. However that is not what this movie is about. This film is about a team of people coming together in order to complete a task that sets up the events of the original trilogy and in that sense this movie does what it sets out to do. An example of this is the robot character K2SO, who I thought was going to start off with no humanity, then over the course of the movie realize the value of human life and then sacrifice himself for the greater good at the movie’s climax, but it transpires that the only real reason that he is helping the Rebels, is because he has been programmed to do so. This I feel sums up the level of character development present in the movie and demonstrates that it is not necessary in the film as that isn’t the movie’s purpose. What Force Awakens lacked in an original plot, it made up for in character development and what Rogue One lacks in

Review – Rogue One: A Star Wars Story Read More »

Scroll to Top