Colin Farrell

The Batman Review

The Batman Review: Is Robert Pattinson the Best Dark Knight?

Review – The Batman Directed by: Matt Reeves Written by: Matt Reeves & Peter Craig Produced by: Matt Reeves & Walter Hamada Starring: Robert Pattinson, Zoe Kravitz & Paul Dano Release Date: March 4th 2022 I got to see The Batman for review on opening night and it blew me away. I have since gotten to see it a second time in order to better cement my thoughts about the film before writing my review. This is a movie based around a detective chasing after a maniacal serial killer who loves to leave riddles for law enforcement before it is a superhero movie. Therefore, it seems only fitting that we begin this review for The Batman with a riddle. How do you tell a revolutionary story based on a character who has already had more than ten big screen outings and still manage to make it feel fresh? Apparently the answer is; you allow acclaimed auteur Matt Reeves to craft a psychological horror film peppered with light arthouse elements based around an iconic comic book hero. That is the thing that struck me the most whilst constructing this review of The Batman: just how darkly risqué certain elements of it felt. I have no shame in saying that I haven’t felt dread like this whilst watching a movie since I first saw Hereditary or Come and See. Sure, The Batman is by no means as hard to watch as either of those aforementioned films, but this is by no means a movie appropriate for children. You could certainly argue that there have been major superhero movies released in the past, which have done well financially despite not being suitable for children such as Deadpool. Although, I would have a much easier time sitting a child down in front of the R-rated Deadpool than I would making them watch The Batman, which carries a PG-13 rating. This is because the most horrifying elements in The Batman aren’t necessarily seen, instead they are felt. It is the dread-filled tone and underlying trepidation that gives The Batman its darkness. And this is also why The Batman feels more like a horror film, rather than a superhero movie or even a typical detective story. Even in comparison to what I consider to be the darkest detective stories ever committed to film in Se7en, Silence Of The Lambs and Prisoners, (which also starred Paul Dano,) The Batman stands out. I cannot stress enough, just how surprised I was by the constant sense of dread present within the undertones of this entire film. The ensemble cast do a phenomenal job of bringing a darker version of their respective characters to life. John Turturro, Paul Dano, Andy Serkis, Jeffrey Wright and Colin Firth all shine within any and all of the screen time that they are given. The real stand out here though is Zoe Kravitz’s electrifying performance as the complex femme fatale that is Selina Kyle. Though, we cannot discuss the film’s cast without mentioning the man at the centre of it all. There has been somewhat of a mixed reaction to Robert Pattinson’s Batman online thus far. The general consensus is that whilst he does a fantastic job of playing Batman, his performance of Bruce Wayne is lacking in certain aspects. The common concern is that his version of Bruce is just too similar to his take on Batman, leaving little difference between the two. Just in case you don’t happen to be an aficionado in all thing Batman, in the comic book source material there are some distinct differences between the two. Whilst Batman is an efficient and brooding vigilante, Bruce Wayne is more of a carefree playboy, or at least this is the persona that he chooses to portray to quell any belief that he and Batman could be the same person. However, one must remember that The Batman takes place pretty early on in Bruce’s crime-fighting career. This is obviously a version of the character who has not yet developed that nuance, his alter ego is still forming. It is also a good thing, as it gives Pattinson room to grow as an actor in any potential sequels. Instead, Pattinson manages to ride a very fine line in his performance here. He is both a lonely introvert, whilst being a looming protector. He is a wraith-like symbol of fear whilst still being a broken boy on the inside carrying a ton of emotional baggage. He is a shining example of what a hero can be, whilst lacking any real social skills. A demigod who still feels undeniably human. And it is this duality that sums up this version of Batman best. His more explicit and ‘traditional,’ sense of duality may still be yet to emerge, but here he is both sides of the coin simultaneously. And this is why I believe that only an actor of Robert Pattinson calibre is right for this role and in that sense, he knocks it out of the park. Getting away from the film’s phenomenal cast, a huge part of what makes this whole thing work is the amalgamation of immense talent behind the camera. Matt Reeves’ direction in tandem with Greig Fraser’s cinematography makes for some astonishing visuals. Some of the breath-taking shots present here rival those of greats such as Roger Deakins or Emmanuel Lubezki. Michael Giacchino’s utterly spectacular score permits the perfect tonal soundscape, which allows The Batman to reach the cinematic goals that it is reaching for. Again, to try to bring a sound that feels fresh and new to a character so synonymous with certain iconic audio cues presents an almost insurmountable challenge. Thankfully Giacchino is more than up to the task. Whilst I loved the experience of getting to see The Batman for review, unfortunately I cannot give it a perfect score. This is not because of any particularly poor element within the movie’s make-up. Instead it is because the film simply does not reach my criteria for a

The Batman Review: Is Robert Pattinson the Best Dark Knight? Read More »

Review – Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them

Review – Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them Directed by: David Yates Written by: JK Rowling Produced by: JK Rowling Starring: Eddie Redmayne, Colin Farrell & Johnny Depp Release Date: November 18th 2016 It is that time again. That time that I decide I hate myself enough to revisit one of the worst movies I have ever seen for review. This time I decided to go back and review Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them, (AKA: JK Rowling and the Never Ending Quest for More Money.) Full disclosure going in; I have never been a fan of the Harry Potter franchise. I’ve read a few of the books and seen a few of the movies and it just hasn’t ever been my thing. Honestly, I’m not even a fan of fantasy in general. I think that Lord Of The Rings is garbage and the worst parts of Game Of Thrones were the fantasy elements, (well that and the ending!) The last Harry Potter movie I saw was the fourth one I think? However, I was willing to go into this movie with a clean slate and hopefully have it win me over and unfortunately it didn’t. Also this review will contain spoilers if you care about that sort of thing. This film is a prequel to the other Harry Potter movies, this time set in America rather than Britain and telling the story of the events that led to the great wizarding war between Dumbledore and Grindlewald. These films did have potential in that sense; to see what would have essentially been WWII fought with magic could be really cool. Unfortunately all we get here is setup and when we get to the sequel it was an even bigger let-down. Fantastic Beasts opens with Eddie Redmayne’s character, Newt Scamander going to New York from London to set free one of the beasts that he keeps inside his Tardis-like brief case. Then he ends up in a bank and meets a ‘Nomaj,’ which is this film’s lazy version of a ‘muggle,’ who we learn is a simple lonely guy that just wants to open his own bakery and that’s another character cliché ticked off the list. We now have the double act of the nerdy, snivelling protagonist and the overweight, sympathetic sidekick. Also, for the rest of this review I will be referring to the baker character as fat bloke. This isn’t to be derogatory, but is purely because the script relies on the, ‘fat, jolly, sympathetic, pathetic loner’ stereotype and passes it off as a character arc. If the script isn’t treating the character with any respect, then why should I? So fat bloke it is then. Of course, the two of them have the exact same briefcase and after some cartoony looking CGI animals escape from Redmayne’s case in the bank the suitcases predictably get mixed up. Then the fat bloke gets his bakery loan declined and returns home with Redmayne’s suitcase. This is followed by more bad CGI animals open the case and attack the fat bloke. Redmayne’s character then gets arrested by some wizarding inspector for letting the, ‘Nomaj,’ (urgh) get away after seeing the animals in the case and is taken to the New York Wizards base, I guess? Then it’s revealed that the wizarding inspector that arrested Redmayne is a pretty subpar inspector and she is trying to redeem herself in the eyes of her superiors. So in front of this high wizard council she confiscates the case from Redmayne and opens it only to reveal a bunch of cakes inside. Yes, really… Who writes this garbage? What Rowling is doing to Harry Potter is worse than what Lucas did to Star Wars during the prequels at this point. So Redmayne gets set free and he goes to fat bloke’s house to find him lying on the floor, then some more bad CGI later the inspector turns up and they take him back to her house to meet her sister? Friend? Does it matter? She ends up becoming the love interest for fat bloke. Then, for no apparent reason Redmayne and fat bloke enter the case and he shows fat bloke all this crazy stuff that apparently humans aren’t supposed to see. Then Redmayne does some more snivelling and decides they have to sneak out of the girls’ apartment and recapture the animals that escaped in the bank and from fat bloke’s apartment. They get a couple of the beasts back then they go to central park to find Redmayne’s horny rhino and they dress fat bloke up in a leather rhino costume and use him as bait then they ice skate for a bit and capture the rhino. Again, really… I am not making this stuff up for satirical reasons. After this, we see real life bad guy Ezra Miller playing some sort of weird emo child who is beat by his mother and is working with Colin Farrell to find a big bad dark spirit that is killing people around New York. Colin Farrell is definitely the best thing about the film at this point. After this a bunch of other stupid crap happens, such as Ron Perlman and John Voight coming into the movie, showing a ray of potential and then being totally wasted. The movie drags in the middle, but eventually after some more fat jokes, bad CGI and snivelling, all of the creatures are captured and Ezra Miller turns into a black death cloud or some such nonsense. Then he boosts around New York, ruining everyone’s day as he goes and so Redmayne and Farrell follow him down to the subway to stop him. Redmayne seems to be talking him down and then Farrell shows up and essentially tells him to join the dark side. Then there is a CGI wand battle and the council from earlier show up out of nowhere and kill the black cloud of death. Then Colin Farrell gets annoyed and in the

Review – Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them Read More »

Scroll to Top