The Long Halloween

The Batman Review

The Batman Review: Is Robert Pattinson the Best Dark Knight?

Review – The Batman Directed by: Matt Reeves Written by: Matt Reeves & Peter Craig Produced by: Matt Reeves & Walter Hamada Starring: Robert Pattinson, Zoe Kravitz & Paul Dano Release Date: March 4th 2022 I got to see The Batman for review on opening night and it blew me away. I have since gotten to see it a second time in order to better cement my thoughts about the film before writing my review. This is a movie based around a detective chasing after a maniacal serial killer who loves to leave riddles for law enforcement before it is a superhero movie. Therefore, it seems only fitting that we begin this review for The Batman with a riddle. How do you tell a revolutionary story based on a character who has already had more than ten big screen outings and still manage to make it feel fresh? Apparently the answer is; you allow acclaimed auteur Matt Reeves to craft a psychological horror film peppered with light arthouse elements based around an iconic comic book hero. That is the thing that struck me the most whilst constructing this review of The Batman: just how darkly risqué certain elements of it felt. I have no shame in saying that I haven’t felt dread like this whilst watching a movie since I first saw Hereditary or Come and See. Sure, The Batman is by no means as hard to watch as either of those aforementioned films, but this is by no means a movie appropriate for children. You could certainly argue that there have been major superhero movies released in the past, which have done well financially despite not being suitable for children such as Deadpool. Although, I would have a much easier time sitting a child down in front of the R-rated Deadpool than I would making them watch The Batman, which carries a PG-13 rating. This is because the most horrifying elements in The Batman aren’t necessarily seen, instead they are felt. It is the dread-filled tone and underlying trepidation that gives The Batman its darkness. And this is also why The Batman feels more like a horror film, rather than a superhero movie or even a typical detective story. Even in comparison to what I consider to be the darkest detective stories ever committed to film in Se7en, Silence Of The Lambs and Prisoners, (which also starred Paul Dano,) The Batman stands out. I cannot stress enough, just how surprised I was by the constant sense of dread present within the undertones of this entire film. The ensemble cast do a phenomenal job of bringing a darker version of their respective characters to life. John Turturro, Paul Dano, Andy Serkis, Jeffrey Wright and Colin Firth all shine within any and all of the screen time that they are given. The real stand out here though is Zoe Kravitz’s electrifying performance as the complex femme fatale that is Selina Kyle. Though, we cannot discuss the film’s cast without mentioning the man at the centre of it all. There has been somewhat of a mixed reaction to Robert Pattinson’s Batman online thus far. The general consensus is that whilst he does a fantastic job of playing Batman, his performance of Bruce Wayne is lacking in certain aspects. The common concern is that his version of Bruce is just too similar to his take on Batman, leaving little difference between the two. Just in case you don’t happen to be an aficionado in all thing Batman, in the comic book source material there are some distinct differences between the two. Whilst Batman is an efficient and brooding vigilante, Bruce Wayne is more of a carefree playboy, or at least this is the persona that he chooses to portray to quell any belief that he and Batman could be the same person. However, one must remember that The Batman takes place pretty early on in Bruce’s crime-fighting career. This is obviously a version of the character who has not yet developed that nuance, his alter ego is still forming. It is also a good thing, as it gives Pattinson room to grow as an actor in any potential sequels. Instead, Pattinson manages to ride a very fine line in his performance here. He is both a lonely introvert, whilst being a looming protector. He is a wraith-like symbol of fear whilst still being a broken boy on the inside carrying a ton of emotional baggage. He is a shining example of what a hero can be, whilst lacking any real social skills. A demigod who still feels undeniably human. And it is this duality that sums up this version of Batman best. His more explicit and ‘traditional,’ sense of duality may still be yet to emerge, but here he is both sides of the coin simultaneously. And this is why I believe that only an actor of Robert Pattinson calibre is right for this role and in that sense, he knocks it out of the park. Getting away from the film’s phenomenal cast, a huge part of what makes this whole thing work is the amalgamation of immense talent behind the camera. Matt Reeves’ direction in tandem with Greig Fraser’s cinematography makes for some astonishing visuals. Some of the breath-taking shots present here rival those of greats such as Roger Deakins or Emmanuel Lubezki. Michael Giacchino’s utterly spectacular score permits the perfect tonal soundscape, which allows The Batman to reach the cinematic goals that it is reaching for. Again, to try to bring a sound that feels fresh and new to a character so synonymous with certain iconic audio cues presents an almost insurmountable challenge. Thankfully Giacchino is more than up to the task. Whilst I loved the experience of getting to see The Batman for review, unfortunately I cannot give it a perfect score. This is not because of any particularly poor element within the movie’s make-up. Instead it is because the film simply does not reach my criteria for a

The Batman Review: Is Robert Pattinson the Best Dark Knight? Read More »

Review – Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two

SUMMARY After the gruesome death of the forgotten son of the Falcone family, Batman finds himself back to square one in the Holiday investigation. As the festive fear continues and suspects are picked off one by one, so to does trust begin to unravel. The question isn’t who is Holiday? anymore, but who do you believe in? ART As I’ve already stated in my review for Part One, the animation style fails to capture the noir-driven aura of the original graphic novel. For those that would argue that replicating the style in animation is impossible, I point you towards the animation studios behind Batman: Gotham Knight and The Animatrix. That aside however, very little attempt was made to at least capture iconic scenes of the comic in it’s own style. Once again, the animation itself is nothing special and can be uncanny valley levels of awkward in scenes of dialogue. Little to no expression or emotional details atop actors trying their best to bring this film to life is just another reason why this adaptation fails to capture the gravitas and Sin City-esque grit of the original comic. WRITING In my previous review for part one I expressed my dislike and interest for the events of the comic being either altered or simply ripped from the script entirely. My interest leaning purely on the potential for an alternate version of The Long Halloween so to justify the changes. Thankfully, this is the case with some additions and focus that in hindsight make sense for the story it’s going for but it was an unusual and frustrating route to take us there. Like The Riddler? Me too! Too bad he’s omitted from the story here. Hope you like Oxford and half assed paternal and maternal issues instead! I wish I could say that the story had some positives to it, perhaps in time when I rewatch it it will stand up. I will say that there are neutral additions to the story, in that they aren’t comparatively good but they aren’t bad either. The film here takes a lot of influence from the Nolan trilogy, to the point where scenes play out like an animated adaptation of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight and they are heartpoundingly thrilling! Ironically, both films were based on the original The Long Halloween comic. My issue with this though is that it distracts from the story to the point where some holidays are simply montaged over; missing out crucial plot details of the Holiday killings and even the mystery of the Holiday Killer itself! OVERALL In conclusion, Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two is a thrilling adaptation of the original comic with the potential for cult success, overshadowed by the fact that it isn’t a faithful adaptation. Now and as a whole, this should have been called Batman: A Long Halloween as this is not THE Long Halloween we all know and love. With generic animation, pacing issues and pointless omissions on top of a new twist, you’ll enjoy this film best with no context of the original comic or at the very most as a lesser version of the story with the promise of what’s to come… [yasr_multiset setid=4] [yasr_visitor_multiset setid=4] Let us know in the comments your thoughts on Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two, your thoughts on the adaptation as a whole and be sure to check out my review for Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One and Dan’s review of Batman: The Long Halloween comic! Buy tickets for BGCP Comic Con in and around Glasgow Scotland – BUY TICKETS Check out all of our Comic, Movie, Television and Videogame Reviews HERE and our Podcasts/Interviews HERE If you want to be part of the BGCP community, Join us on Discord, Twitter, Instagram etc then click HERE

Review – Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two Read More »

Review – Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One

SUMMARY Gotham’s annual festivities turn to fearful nights of fright as a mysterious murderer known only as Holiday picks of the Falcone and Roman families one by one on each consecutive holiday. It’s up to Batman, Harvey Dent & Jim Gordon to put the pieces together and save Gotham from a year-long seasonal serial killing spree. VISUALS Firstly, character designs have been sucked clean of Tim Sale’s gorgeously noirish comic style for more generic and oddly unfinished looking appearances. As well as this, characters seem to be suffering from rigor mortis with a slow and jagged stiffness to their animation atop a gloriously smooth looking art deco backdrop. Not unlike the pop art style of the spy comedy series, Archer, but with more visual phrasing.  Joker says it best in this film, “Navy, navy, charcoal, black. Euk! Really Carm, is a splash of colour too much to ask?”. Despite the original comic’s dark and monochromatic appearance, the comic popped with a minimalistic festive colour palette; Halloween oranges, Valentine’s Day reds, New Year yellows, etc. Arguably, this was a large part of the comic’s charm and style. For a story gift wrapped in holiday spirit, the wide spectrum of bright holiday colours amongst the bleak backdrop of Gotham is sorely missing from this film adaptation. It’s very hard to tell what holiday we’re supposed to be celebrating. VOICEWORK & WRITING Let’s talk about the good in this adaptation. The voicecast, while nowhere near as iconic as the longstanding original voices, do a phenomenal job in recreating the beloved characters. Every voice is unique but unmistakably perfect for the variety of personalities throughout. Stand-out performances being Troy Baker’s return as the Joker with darker Hamillisms and David Dastmalchian as Calender Man with an uncomfortable monotone performance. Unfortunately, stellar impressions don’t make for a great performance as the dialogue and acting itself is both tonally inconsistent and awkward throughout, as if the actors had no frame of reference to work off of. Why the brilliant dialogue of the comic couldn’t be brought to life or at least replicated here is baffling to me. Remember in Batman: Mask of Phantasm when you got goosebumps from Shirley Walker’s tremendously grandiose choir filling the Gotham night air on top of an earthshattering orchestral ambience? Listen to it again if you can’t remember it…yeah. Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One is virtually devoid of music aside from a minimalistic pinch of ambience every now and again. There’s an entire chase scene with no music whatsoever and it is SO AWKWARD! Batman has some of the best pieces of music in cinema history and this here is an embarrassing disappointment. Annoyingly, events and details, bar the actual holidays themselves, are all out of place, altered or in some cases just omitted from the script with pointless padding in it’s place. This totally ruins the flow, suspense and drama of the original comic that makes it such a beloved entry in the mythos of Batman, as well as makes the twists painfully obvious. While I can’t say I like that Palmer is writing his own calendar for the monthly mayhem, it is intriguing enough to see where he goes with it and if he opts for an alternative ending to the comic. If the end result is the same however, what was the point in changing key details? OVERALL In conclusion, Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One honestly feels like a bootleg adaptation of the classic comic in every way. I wouldn’t be surprised if it came out that Palmer couldn’t secure the rights to the story so he had to make his own that loosely follows the original. Either that or he hasn’t read the comic! Everything from it’s cardboard cutout look and monotonous animation to it’s first take dialogue and story inconsistencies makes the film feel wholly unfinished. I hate that I have to write this review as it hurts me to my core. I was so excited to see my favourite Batman comic get the feature length animated treatment. There are sparks of the Batman spirit in the cracks of this film but the sheer amount of problems it has eclipse any semblance of hope for the adaptation. The only way I could see redemption for the film is if it leans into it’s askew recollection of the comic in order to produce a whole new take on the Holiday storyline, perhaps giving the adaptation a unique alternate reality edge with different results i.e. cementing it as it’s own story. However, if Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two continues to stumble it’s way to the original finish line, this will be cemented in my mind as a colossal failure for DC. [yasr_multiset setid=4] [yasr_visitor_multiset setid=4] Let us know in the comments your thoughts on Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One, your thoughts on the original Jeph Loeb comic & be sure to check out Dan’s review of Batman: The Long Halloween comic and my recent comic reviews for Batman: The Detective! Buy tickets for BGCP Comic Con in and around Glasgow Scotland – BUY TICKETS Check out all of our Comic, Movie, Television and Videogame Reviews HERE and our Podcasts/Interviews HERE If you want to be part of the BGCP community, Join us on Discord, Twitter, Instagram etc then click HERE

Review – Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One Read More »

The Dark Knight Review: Why It Is A 2008 Masterpiece

The Dark Knight Review: Why It Is A 2008 Masterpiece

Searching for a definitive The Dark Knight review to see if Christopher Nolan’s epic still holds the crown? Since its release in 2008, this film hasn’t just remained a fan favorite—it has become the gold standard for the entire genre. While modern hits like The Batman have tried to capture its grit, our The Dark Knight review explores why this crime epic remains untouchable in 2026. The Plot: An Intense Dark Knight Review of Gotham The story follows Batman (Christian Bale), Lieutenant Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman), and District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) as they form an alliance to dismantle organized crime in Gotham. However, their efforts are sabotaged by a chaotic new criminal mastermind known as The Joker (Heath Ledger). As we dive deeper into this The Dark Knight review, it’s clear the film is a high-stakes crime thriller. The opening bank heist sets a tone of realism that was unheard of for comic book movies at the time. The Joker doesn’t want money; he wants to prove that under pressure, everyone is as “ugly” as he is. Heath Ledger: The Performance That Changed Everything In any The Dark Knight review, Heath Ledger is the undisputed center of gravity. His Oscar-winning portrayal of the Joker wasn’t just “good acting”—it was a seismic shift in pop culture. Ledger famously isolated himself for weeks to develop the character’s unique, high-pitched “glass-shredding” voice and manic tics. From the “pencil trick” to his chillingly calm interrogation by Batman, Ledger transformed the Joker from a “clown” into a philosophical force of nature. Even in 2026, his performance remains the benchmark that no other villain has quite reached. Christian Bale: From Cult Star to Global Icon While Ledger stole the headlines, we have to look at how Christian Bale used this film to become a global superstar. Before 2008, Bale was respected for cult hits like American Psycho, but The Dark Knight proved he could carry the biggest movie in the world. Bale’s Bruce Wayne provided the emotional weight that allowed Ledger’s Joker to shine. His physical dedication—rebuilding his body after The Machinist—became the blueprint for the modern “superhero transformation.” After this film smashed the $1 billion mark, Bale wasn’t just an actor; he was a box-office titan. The Long Halloween Review Gear Up: Must-Have Gear After Our Dark Knight Review If our The Dark Knight review has you ready to return to Gotham, check out these top-rated items on Amazon: Final Verdict: Wrapping Up Our Dark Knight Review To wrap up this The Dark Knight review, Christopher Nolan didn’t just make a Batman movie; he made a cinematic masterpiece that transcends the genre. It is a haunting exploration of order vs. chaos that remains as relevant today as it was in 2008. Final Score: 10/10

The Dark Knight Review: Why It Is A 2008 Masterpiece Read More »

Scroll to Top