Warner Bros.

Is The Matrix Resurrections Good? Review & Verdict

Review – The Matrix: Resurrections Directed by: Lana Wachowski Written by: Lana Wachowski, David Mitchell & Aleksandar Hemon Produced by: Lana & Karin Wachowski Starring: Keanu Reeves & Carrie-Anne Moss Release Date: December 22nd 2021 The reviews for The Matrix: Resurrections have been pretty mixed, which meant that I when I went to see the movie last night, I really did not know what to expect. To give you some context, I grew up with the Matrix and spent much of my childhood lying back on my couch with my feet on the floor pretending that there were bullets whizzing past my head in slow motion. So obviously, I really wanted this latest entry to be great. Having had about 12 hours to ruminate on the movie, I am still feeling somewhat conflicted about Resurrections. The movie itself is pretty great, in fact I would go as far as to say that it is probably the best Matrix movie after the iconic original. We all knew that this latest entry could never surpass the first film, so surely all that it had to do in order to justify its existence was be better than the other two sequels, right? The Matrix: Resurrections in fact had to be more than that. The most unfortunate thing is that the reason it had to be more than just a ‘good sequel,’ was simply due to timing. See, Resurrections dropped in cinemas just one week after Spider-Man: No Way Home did. Both of these are movies which rely heavily on nostalgia from past entries in their respective franchises. Unfortunately Spider-Man has Matrix beat in this aspect and when No Way Home is still so fresh in the collective mind of cinema-goers, that is an aspect that is hard to shake. I saw an internet comments recently that stated; “It is a shame that Matrix: Resurrections is coming out just a week after No Way Home. Spider-Man will likely take most of the box office for the entirety of December, leaving The Matrix to lose out financially and yet Matrix will likely be the far more original of the two movies.” I am not going to name the person that left this comment or divulge where they left it however, I would like to award them with the coveted prize of the most incorrect comment of 2021. Not for the box office prediction, they are probably quite right in saying that this movie will make no money, but the other thing. Whilst No Way Home used the stories from the past to elevate the current story being told in an emotionally effective way, Resurrections feels more like we are being fed memberberry pie. Nostalgia is used more as a crutch here rather than a storytelling tool. This fairly lazily implemented attempt at tickling the audience’s nostalgia bone would have been irritating enough, without Resurrections thinking it was being so damn clever whilst doing so. Listen, I am not against meta storytelling whatsoever, I enjoy Deadpool and Rick and Morty as much as the next person. However, it just felt somewhat forced here and sort of like Lana Wachowski thought that she was being far more clever than she actually was in parts. With all of that said, it is pretty unfair to hold the coincidentally poor timing against this otherwise entertaining entry in the franchise, “but here we are.” Other than the obvious nostalgia-bait that was being dangled throughout the film, I did enjoy most other aspects of Resurrections. Seeing Keanu, Carrie-Anne Moss and Jada Pinkett-Smith return as Neo, Trinity and Niobe respectively was a treat. Keanu did a great job of portraying a different version of Neo. One that was more emotional and psychologically damaged. When it comes to Jada Pinkett-Smith’s performances, they are usually pretty hit and miss for me, but I actually enjoyed her in the role of an aged Niobe. Although Carrie-Anne Moss did a phenomenal job when she was onscreen in the film, I was a little disappointed with how long it really took her character to ‘arrive.’ Although she does get a lot of play in the final act of the movie and nails every scene she appears in, I could have definitely done with seeing some more of her in the movie. Personally, I really enjoyed Yahya Abdul-Mateen II’s performance here as a new Morpheus, although I could see why it might prove divisive for fans of the more stoic original version of the character. The other main newcomer to the series was Jessica Henwick as Bugs and I enjoyed her character as well. Slight spoilers here, however this reveal was illustrated in the movie’s second trailer. Jonathan Groff plays the new version of Agent Smith. I have heard complaints about him being too jovial, however I would personally prefer that the actor makes the role their own rather than just do an impression of Hugo Weaving. I have heard some complaints being made regarding the visual effects in the movie, however I never had any real problem with those aspects of Resurrections. The direction was fine and the script was serviceable, even if it was chock-full of obvious call backs. In fact, that last criticism could be used to describe The Matrix: Resurrections as a whole and that was the thing that I felt let down by the most when watching the film. Rather than building on what had come before to progress the series, this movie seemed to be far more content to simply repeat what had come before with a fresh lick of paint. A sequel to something as iconic as the Matrix justifying its own existence is a big thing for me. I spent most of my review of The Last Of Us 2 complaining about how the sequel was never able to justify itself in my mind. Even though The Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions weren’t great films, they at least tried to expand on the first movie, whereas Resurrections feels much more

Is The Matrix Resurrections Good? Review & Verdict Read More »

Review – Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two

SUMMARY After the gruesome death of the forgotten son of the Falcone family, Batman finds himself back to square one in the Holiday investigation. As the festive fear continues and suspects are picked off one by one, so to does trust begin to unravel. The question isn’t who is Holiday? anymore, but who do you believe in? ART As I’ve already stated in my review for Part One, the animation style fails to capture the noir-driven aura of the original graphic novel. For those that would argue that replicating the style in animation is impossible, I point you towards the animation studios behind Batman: Gotham Knight and The Animatrix. That aside however, very little attempt was made to at least capture iconic scenes of the comic in it’s own style. Once again, the animation itself is nothing special and can be uncanny valley levels of awkward in scenes of dialogue. Little to no expression or emotional details atop actors trying their best to bring this film to life is just another reason why this adaptation fails to capture the gravitas and Sin City-esque grit of the original comic. WRITING In my previous review for part one I expressed my dislike and interest for the events of the comic being either altered or simply ripped from the script entirely. My interest leaning purely on the potential for an alternate version of The Long Halloween so to justify the changes. Thankfully, this is the case with some additions and focus that in hindsight make sense for the story it’s going for but it was an unusual and frustrating route to take us there. Like The Riddler? Me too! Too bad he’s omitted from the story here. Hope you like Oxford and half assed paternal and maternal issues instead! I wish I could say that the story had some positives to it, perhaps in time when I rewatch it it will stand up. I will say that there are neutral additions to the story, in that they aren’t comparatively good but they aren’t bad either. The film here takes a lot of influence from the Nolan trilogy, to the point where scenes play out like an animated adaptation of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight and they are heartpoundingly thrilling! Ironically, both films were based on the original The Long Halloween comic. My issue with this though is that it distracts from the story to the point where some holidays are simply montaged over; missing out crucial plot details of the Holiday killings and even the mystery of the Holiday Killer itself! OVERALL In conclusion, Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two is a thrilling adaptation of the original comic with the potential for cult success, overshadowed by the fact that it isn’t a faithful adaptation. Now and as a whole, this should have been called Batman: A Long Halloween as this is not THE Long Halloween we all know and love. With generic animation, pacing issues and pointless omissions on top of a new twist, you’ll enjoy this film best with no context of the original comic or at the very most as a lesser version of the story with the promise of what’s to come… [yasr_multiset setid=4] [yasr_visitor_multiset setid=4] Let us know in the comments your thoughts on Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two, your thoughts on the adaptation as a whole and be sure to check out my review for Batman: The Long Halloween, Part One and Dan’s review of Batman: The Long Halloween comic! Buy tickets for BGCP Comic Con in and around Glasgow Scotland – BUY TICKETS Check out all of our Comic, Movie, Television and Videogame Reviews HERE and our Podcasts/Interviews HERE If you want to be part of the BGCP community, Join us on Discord, Twitter, Instagram etc then click HERE

Review – Batman: The Long Halloween, Part Two Read More »

Scroll to Top